All future blogs concerning Lake Thurmond Levels will be at a new web site. Go to www.saveourlakesnow.blogspot.com
lakethurmondlevel
Monday, August 12, 2013
Sunday, July 21, 2013
YOUR VOTE IN UPCOMING ELECTIONS CAN IMPACT LAKE LEVELS
I met with Gary Gerrard who is running for Congress in
Georgia’s 10th district for about an hour on Thursday. He is
very interested in what he can do to help with our lake situation if
elected. He sees the recommendations being put forth by Save Our Lakes Now
as sensible and wondered why the Corps is not doing anything with them.
We agreed that the basic problem for lake stakeholders is we have no meaningful
representation at the Corps meetings where release rates, etc. are
discussed. We desperately need someone who has skin in the game from the
stand point of recreation who will not be a yes man for the Corps.
We need to pass the word that our votes in upcoming
congressional or senatorial races can make a big difference on how our lakes
are managed. The current representatives and Senators for some reason are
staying at arm’s length from the battle. The changes needed to correct
our problems with lake levels are not complicated. We already know how to
eliminate the destruction to recreational infrastructure using what has been
learned in recent droughts. But our leaders sit quietly by while the
Corps waits for further study to be done. Even when the studies are
complete we will not be any better off unless we can get representation in interpreting
the study results. We all know from problems with our government that the
way something is interpreted depends on the mindset (eg. Democrat vs
Republican) of the person doing the interpretation. The same holds true
with interpreting the results of lake studies.
I urge you to make sure the person you vote for in the
upcoming elections is concerned about our lakes and willing to get into the
fray over how our lakes are managed. At the very least they need to
insist that recreation ,the one Corps responsibility that is being ignored, be
put into the equation of balancing the basin.
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
CORPS HAS SOLUTION TO LAKE LEVEL PROBLEM
The recent issue of Balancing the Basin offers a fantastic
solution to our lake level problems that should be totally acceptable to all
Savannah River Basin (SRB) interests. It is really quite simple yet it
answers the environmentalists desire to stay away from the ravages of a river
in severe drought and fish and wildlife’s desire for more variation in river
flows while taking care of the lake stakeholders desire to avoid the
devastating low lake levels experienced in recent droughts. The solution
is to operate the lakes all the time the same way they do in flood stage.
To accomplish this we are going to have to get the operating plan for our lakes fixed now while the lakes are full rather than wait till the next drought happens. That's going to be hard because everyone is excited now that the lakes are full. Somehow we are going to have to get our political leaders like Jeff Duncan involved more aggressively. And
if you know a way to contact any of the candidates for Paul Broun’s office we
need to make them aware as well.
Saturday, June 29, 2013
THE NEXT BIG THING IN LAKE LEVELS
Everything looks great right now with all the rain and the
lakes full. But the way the Corps
controls lake levels through the fall and winter months can wipe out all our
gains in one season. Right now the Corps
management plan calls for a 4’ drop in lake levels in October, just like they
have done for years. The reason for this
draw down is to provide room for heavy rains in the winter and spring. When this was put into effect we only had one
lake (Lake Thurmond) to catch the run off.
Now there are 3 lakes and a 2’ drop in level now equates to a 4’
drop before Hartwell and Russell were
added. We have pleaded with the Corps
for years to back off to only a 2’ drop in the Fall but up to now they have not
agreed to such a change.
We need help from our congressman and all lake stakeholders
to get the Corps to make this change.
Please contact your congressman and the Corps now about making this
change in the way the lakes are operated before we get to October. Unless we act now the lakes will be down 4’
come next January which puts us behind the eight ball when it comes to
returning to full pool in 2014. Protecting recreation for next year begins this
October. What we do over the Fall and
Winter months can make the difference between reasonable drops in lake level
during a drought and the disastrous drops in lake levels we’ve experienced in
recent years.
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
LAKE LEVEL CONTROL 101
The current situation we find ourselves in at Lake Thurmond
and Lake Hartwell provides an excellent example of how to balance the Savannah
River Basin.
What if we used the same method of control in flood stage
that the Corps is using in drought stage. If we did, release rates would be based totally on some
feel good number for river flows.
·
For example lets imagine that the NOAA asks that
the river flows be held at 4,200cfs maximum until the lakes reach 5’ above full pool. They could do so out of concern for critters in
the river that will die because of high river flows and/or flooding
downstream.
·
If that were the basis the lakes could easily climb to levels
that are hazardous from the standpoint of flooding and we would be in a
massive problem both upstream and downstream.
This scenario is ridiculous and the Corps would quickly take
the bull by the horns and explain to NOAA that meeting their request is simply
not feasible. That is what managers do.
Whether you are in a drought or in flood stage, the only
reasonable method of control is to use lake levels as the basis for control
rather than release rates. Holding lake levels to a maximum of 5’ above
full pool in flood stage is no different than holding lake levels within 5’ of
full pool in a drought. The difference in what the Corps does in a
drought is they control by release rates rather than holding lake level within
a reasonable range. Just as there is a maximum reasonable release rate
based on downstream flooding there is a minimum reasonable release rate based
on experiences downstream in past droughts. Right now that lower limit is
3600cfs based on the experience gained in the drought of 2008. In flood
stage, everyone will agree that at 2’ above full pool lake levels should take
precedence over release rates. In drought stage the Corps needs to
recognize 2’ below full pool is the point
where lake levels take precedence over release rates.
Lest anyone think lake levels are not a proper concern for
the Corps, Congress added recreation and protecting
fish and wildlife to the list of responsibilities in managing our lakes
in 1988. Recreation consists of the infrastructure required for
recreation on the lakes not whether someone can fish a given spot on the lake
or river. That infrastructure includes the marinas, campgrounds, support
businesses such as dock building, and all the real estate developed to provide
access to the lakes.
Looking at the full list of
responsibilities the Corps has in managing our lakes, holding to
reasonable minimums or maximums in release rates provides the protection needed
for flood control, water supply/quality and
fish and wildlife. Recreation is protected by
keeping lake levels within 8 ft of full pool. Power production is simply
a goal the Corps has with SEPA. Falling short of the power production
goal from too low a release rate is simply an economic consideration. Any deficiency in power production
at the dams can be corrected by purchase of power off site. The money
involved in purchasing make up power is dwarfed by the destruction to the value
of recreational infrastructure from excessive loss of lake level so recreation trumps power anytime the two are in
competition.
Jerry Clontz, spokesman for Save
Our Lakes Now
Thursday, June 6, 2013
TEST OF CORPS' INTENTIONS TOWARD PROTECTING RECREATION HAS BEGUN
We wrote in our blog on May 25th, "TIME TO CORRECT DROUGHT PLAN IS NOW, NOT AFTER THE LAKES HAVE DROPPED". Apparently this fell on deaf ears because the current issue of Balancing the Basin indicates no intention of changing from past practices. They project the lakes will drop 3.5 ft by mid August with no requirement to modify release rates until the lakes drop more than 4'.
As we've discussed many times a 4' drop in lake level before decreasing release rates causes destruction of recreation. From that point the lake will drop more than 10' in a severe drought even if minimum release rates are initiated. Following is a repeat of our recommendations for protecting recreation along with all the other concerns the Corps is supposed to be protecting for the Savannah River Basin.
As we've discussed many times a 4' drop in lake level before decreasing release rates causes destruction of recreation. From that point the lake will drop more than 10' in a severe drought even if minimum release rates are initiated. Following is a repeat of our recommendations for protecting recreation along with all the other concerns the Corps is supposed to be protecting for the Savannah River Basin.
- Maintain lake levels at full pool as long as this can be done without dropping release rates below 3600cfs. In other words balance input and output in such a fashion that the lakes stay full rather than allowing the lakes to drop several feet before becoming concerned about lake levels.
- Once the lakes drop more than 2’ with a release rate of 3600cfs, maintain 3600cfs (3100 in winter months) until the lakes return to full pool.
- Anytime the lakes are down more than 2’ and the river is swollen from heavy rains, shut off flows from the dams until the river flows return to normal. This will help minimize the amount of time reduced release rates are needed.
Sunday, June 2, 2013
WHICH IS IT? DOES THE CORPS CONSIDER ECONOMICS IN SETTING RELEASE RATES OR NOT?
Repeatedly we have asked the Corps to decrease release rates
because of the huge impact low lake levels have on the recreation
infrastructure around the lakes. By recreation infrastructure we mean
real estate built for lake access and lake view, campgrounds, marinas, and all
the many investments related to recreation around the lakes. Each time
the Corps has assured us they are not permitted to consider economics when
determining release rates.
Now, in the most recent issue of balancing the basin, Billy
Birdwell explains that the Corps is now able to hold a 3800cfs release rate
because they have met their power quotas with SEPA. The only reason power
quotas are important is that power purchased to replace hydro power shortages
costs more than hydropower produced by our lakes. I may be confused but
it seems to me that cost of power is nothing more than an economic
consideration. Surely I must be mistaken because the cost of monetary
losses to recreational infrastructure from low lake levels dwarfs the added
cost of power. Matter of fact the total value of power produced on all three
of our lakes is peanuts compared to the economic losses from low lake levels
exceeding a drop of 10’.
What I see happening violates good engineering
principles. Good engineering means to use the information at hand to the
full extent possible to perform a task such as managing our basins rather than
wait for a perfect solution based on endless studies. The data from all the
droughts of the past decade is more than sufficient to avoid drops in lake
level in excess of 8-10’ while avoiding problems to downstream interests.
Instead the Corps makes endless excuses to avoid the changes
needed. While you can always learn more from further studies, there is no
need to wait for these studies before making changes that will prevent the
devastation we keep experiencing every time a drought occurs. Save Our
Lakes Now has outlined a sound approach to drought control in our previous
blogs but to date there is no evidence that the Corps plans to incorporate
these changes.
I ask again is Save Our Lakes Now the only organization
concerned about this and other inconsistencies in the way the Corps is
controlling our lakes. Where are our congressmen and the other lake
organizations when it comes to getting the Corps to optimize the drought plan
for the Savannah River Basin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)