The argument the Corps keeps giving is that people downstream would be hurt unnecessarily if the rates were decreased before now. Not true. Not one single stakeholder on the river had problems with operation at 3600cfs for over 12 consecutive months in the drought of 2008-9. The only people who complained were environmental groups expressing concern that problems MIGHT occur at this low a flow to the river.
There are a number of very strong arguments to counter holding flows up because they MIGHT be a problem.
- If a REAL problem occurs the release rates can be increased when that happens
- Nature only provides 3600cfs input averaged over a year so anything higher than that is man trying to one up Nature. Man just isn't that smart. Smoothing out flooding and the severity of the driest parts of droughts makes sense but trying to generate water out of thin air does not.
- Water is one of our most precious commodities. It ranks right up there with air. Deliberately throwing fresh water away by releasing more to the ocean than nature does is criminal and needs to stop.
No comments:
Post a Comment